What's causing the gap?

1/3


Disaggregation

What is disaggregation and why is it important?

Disaggregation is defined by the OECD as ‘the breakdown of observations, usually within a common branch of a hierarchy, to a more detailed level’.

In the context of this report this means that we don’t simply take averages of the salaries of all of our employees from all UK ethnic minorities; rather we compare the average salary of e.g. all of our black employees with that of all of our white employees.

Our pay gaps

At City & Guilds our mean and median pay gaps are 5.2% and 5.6% respectively when employees from all ethnic minorities are grouped together. However, these aggregated figures mask significant variance of 30% between ethnic groups.

Our data
-9.%

Mean Asian pay gap

5.%

Mean aggregated pay gap

20.%

Mean black pay gap

Our variances

Our Asian employees earn on average 9.2% (mean) or 15.4% (median) more than our white employees, whereas our black employees earn 20.5% or 20.7% less and our employees of mixed ethnicity 14.2% or 9.7% less.

National context

This disparity is seen at a national level too, albeit it is nuanced and not necessarily on the same scale. For example the national gap for black citizens is between 4% (Caribbean) and 8% (African), whereas for Asian citizens the range is from 16% (Pakistani) to -16% (Indian), i.e. citizens of Pakistani ethnicity earn on average 16% less than white citizens; whereas those of Indian ethnicity earn on average 16% more.

How can you help as a City & Guilds employee?

Support the change by self-disclosing your data so we can have a more accurate picture of our workforce demographics.

How to self-disclose my diversity data
< Previous page
Next page >